Wednesday 14 November 2012

Angola: When ethnicity, tribalism narrow nationalism

Pepetela

Some of the world’s greatest literary works are books about wars.

One can think about Ernest Hemingway’s 1929 novel A Farewell to Arms, Henri Barbusse’s Under Fire: A Story of a Squad (1916) and Robert Graves’ novel Goodbye to All That (1929) which are about the First World War. Then there is Catch-22 by Joseph Heller and Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five.

These books are about wars as told from the inside by people who saw, felt and participated. From them we get to know what it is like inside.

For example, in A Farewell to Arms the American Hemingway, an ambulance driver looks at the war in a cynical way mixing the beauty of romance and the ugly agonies and senselessness of war while in Under Fire: The Story of a Squad published as Le Feu: journal d'une escouade, Frenchman Barbusse, a former WW1 soldier, does not spare any details in his narrative – all the gritty is captured.

British soldier, Graves’ Goodbye to All That captures life in the trenches and prisoners’ of war narratives. The book also says goodbye to patriotism, religion and welcome all other –isms. 

Second World War brought Catch 22 by Heller which depicts the war as a lose-lose or a win-win situation.

Southern Africa has seen some of the most gruesome wars of liberation fought on the continent especially Angola, Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Namibia.

Although most of the details of how the war wounded hearts and souls and snuffed out lives are yet to be told, some ex-combatants in Namibia and Zimbabwe are coming out to speak about their feelings and experiences.

But maybe, the greatest difference between European and African war narratives is how tribalism, ethnicity, and religion play a divisive role even when there is a common enemy to contend with.

This was the case with the Angolan war from which one of the most popular war narratives, Mayombe, is set. 

While in most cases, the people who join the war appear to do so for collective freedom, underneath simmers ambition and search for personal glory. 

Angola has been at war longer than any other southern African country. Apart from the war of liberation from the Portuguese which started in 1961 and ended in 1975, a civil war started between the Union for the Total Independence of Angola (Unita) and the Movement for the Popular Liberation of Angola (MPLA). 

The civil war was in essence between the southerners (Unita) and the northerners (MPLA). These parties were also caught between the warring west and apartheid South Africa and the communist states (Cuba and the former Soviet Union).

The civil war stretched until 2002 when Unita leader Jonas Savimbi was gunned down.

One of the most popular books about the Angolan civil war, Mayombe was written by Pepetela, a former MPLA fighter. Although the book was later published in 1980, Pepetela started writing the short stories in 1970. 

The book depicts life among a guerrilla detachment fighting in an area called Mayombe in northern Cabinda province. The guerrillas are drawn from Angola’s different ethnic groups.

Although they were drawn into the war to fight a common enemy, the guerrillas found themselves caught up in their ethnic, tribal and cultural differences.

The divisions along ethnicity overshadow the bigger picture of nationalism. It narrows collectivism and gives advantage to the common enemy.

In one heart-rending incident, the guerrillas refuse to help one of their own – Muatianvua because he is not Kimbundu or Kikongo. A commander, Fearless remarks: “Were Muatianvua Kikongo or Kimbundu four or five would soon have come forward . . .”

Apart from ethnicity and tribalism, the guerrillas too have difficulties in reconciling with each other because their reasons for joining the war are different.  

Take Gabela, for example, who joins the war because he wants to be regarded as an Angolan and not a coloured. His motive is identity. Another guerrilla, Struggle, joins the war because people in his area – Cabinda – are regarded as traitors. 

Struggle says: “How to convince the guerrillas . . .  that my people are not just made up of traitors? I shall have . . . to assert myself, by being braver than anyone.”

Yet another guerrilla, New World, is a Marxist and for him, man as an individual is nothing, only the masses can make history. 

 “The Revolution is made by the mass of the people, the sole entity with leadership capacity . . .” he says.

Fearless is fighting for heroism and he remarks: “What I am doing has a selfish purpose . . . No-one is permanently unselfish.” And that selfish purpose leads to his death while saving a Kimbundu. 

Before his death, Fearless had said: “I do not care if someone is Kikongo or Kimbundu . . .”

But among these over ambitious individuals can be found some sensible individuals. In case of Mayombe, João pushes forward nationalistic values where people cease to be Kimbundu or Kikongo.

In Mayombe, Fearless and João symbolise national unity and multi-culturalism which are always, in some cases, the desired end results of armed struggle against colonialism.
For Angolans just like for the rest of Africa, wars bring together people from different walks of life but when it’s over, each pursues their own personal, tribal, ethnicity, religious and regional interests. 

Tribalism, which Senegalese Leopold Senghor described as the balkanisation of Africa, is responsible for the bulk of Africa’s problems today. 

In most, if not all cases, Africa does not take advantage of its tribal diversity to advance itself but only for its destruction. Look at Kenya, instead of using the advantages tribes bring, it went through a brutal post-election period.
In a nutshell, Mayombe then is not an Angolan war narrative but Africa’s.

No comments:

Post a Comment